n
CaseLaw
The Respondent was a Director of the 1st Appellant (1st Defendant at the lower Court.) At an Extra Ordinary General Meeting the Respondent was removed as a Director. He brought this action seeking, inter alia; a declaration that
It was shown by evidence at the trial that shares were allotted to the Respondent but he did not pay for them. It was also shown that the account into which the 2nd Appellant paid the contract sum formed part of the assets of the 1st Appellant taken over by it upon its incorporation. The Respondent did not make any issue on his pleadings as regards the legality or competence if the meeting at which he was removed.
After trial, the trial judge granted the reliefs above .claimed by the Respondent in consequence of which the Appellants appealed to the Court of Appeal.
Whether the trial judge was right to have held that the Respondent...